Autobayng News Team
Cadillac’s first Formula 1 start is just six months away. Their debut on the grid will be a proud moment for all involved in the project.
There is one fly in the ointment, however. One of their two drivers will have to serve a grid penalty for the race due to an infringement which was committed over 12 months early.
The Abu Dhabi Grand Prix stewards handed Valtteri Bottas a five-place grid drop for colliding with Kevin Magnussen during the race last year. The rules stated it should be served at his next event. However as Bottas is not on the grid this year he has not been able to.
He almost did: Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff said the team came close to drafting Bottas in as a substitute for the unwell George Russell at Baku last week. Had they done so, he would have had to serve the penalty then. Instead it will now be applied when he appears for new team Cadillac in next year’s curtain-raiser at Melbourne.
F1 is changing its rules so that driver will not have punishments hanging over them for so long in future. But is it right or wrong that Bottas should eventually have to serve the penalty he received at Yas Marina last year?
For
The FIA has already decided long-standing penalties should expire in the future. They will not in Bottas’s case because he incurred his penalty before the rule was changed.
But the principle of expiring penalties after a year or more is sound. Bottas committed his offence while driving for a different team and in a collision with a driver who isn’t in F1 any more. Penalising him for it over a year later would serve no purpose.
Against
It is fundamentally unfair to cancel a penalty for one driver, when other drivers have served similar penalties for similar incidents, merely because the timings in one case are different.
In any system of justice it is important that the rules are seen to be enforced. Arbitrarily waving a penalty just because a certain amount of time has passed suggests the infringement wasn’t worth penalising in the first place.
I say
This is one of those occasions where I do not see the logic for an argument at all. Bottas was found to have broken the rules, he was given a penalty for it. Why should the passage of a year or more mean he should not have to serve it any more?
It seems completely arbitrary to me. His absence from the sport for a year has already put him at a comparative advantage as all the penalty points he accrued on his licence have now expired. Wiping out a penalty he earned would make the stewards’ decision completely worthless.
You say
Should Bottas’s grid penalty for his first race back be cancelled? Cast your vote below and have your say in the comments.
Do you agree Bottas’s penalty for the first race of 2026 should be cancelled?
- No opinion (3%)
- Strongly disagree (37%)
- Slightly disagree (12%)
- Neither agree nor disagree (4%)
- Slightly agree (8%)
- Strongly agree (35%)
Total Voters: 91
Loading …
A RaceFans account is required in order to vote. If you do not have one, register an account here or read more about registering here. When this poll is closed the result will be displayed instead of the voting form.
Debates and polls
- ‘Two roosters’ or a ‘number one’ driver: What’s the best way to run an F1 team?
- Which penalty calls did F1’s stewards get right – and wrong – in 2025? Part three
- Poll: Has the time come for F1 to introduce reverse grids to its sprint races?
- Poll: Should F1 hold a joint event with Moto GP?
- Poll: Which driver line up should Mercedes choose for 2026?
