After Formula 1 announced its radical new technical regulations for 2026, some have feared the consequences for the racing could be dire.
But the months of conjecture will come to an end this weekend as we finally get to see how F1’s new generation of V6 turbo hybrids will perform over a grand prix distance.
Here are the talking points for the season-opening Australian Grand Prix.
Will F1’s new rules pass their first test?
F1’s extended pre-season period gave teams valuable extra time to suss out the intricacies of their new power units. However concerns the cars would struggle to keep their larger batteries topped up appear to have been realised.
This is a particular concern heading into the opening race at Albert Park, which is a very different circuit to Bahrain, where the majority of testing took place. Bahrain has several large braking areas which give cars ample opportunity to generate electrical energy.
But Melbourne features fewer long braking zones. There are particular doubts about how cars will perform along the fast run from turn five to 11. And if one team has mastered the rules much more successfully than others, the close competition of recent seasons could rapidly become a fond memory.
As is often observed, ‘success has many parents but failure is an orphan’. If the opening race proves as disappointing as some fear it will, pay close attention to how FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem and FOM CEO Stefano Domenicali react to it – if they choose to say anything at all.
At least the teams appear likely to be spared the added complication of wet weather. Unlike last year, conditions are forecast to be dry and sunny.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
Are Aston Martin planning to park?
The new Honda-powered Aston Martin was unquestionably the biggest disappointment of testing. Not least for Fernando Alonso, who faces a repeat of his dark days at McLaren-Honda of 2015-17.
There has even been lurid speculation that the team’s power unit supplier is so short of parts Aston Martin will only complete the formation lap in the race and then retire their cars. Is this a genuine fear – or a carefully-placed story designed to lower expectations?
Is the Mercedes hype justified?
Mercedes dominated F1 in the years following the last change of power unit regulations, which prompted many to claim they will do the same again. But they failed to master the ground effect regulations in recent years and their customer team McLaren became the team to beat.
Has Mercedes seized the opportunity to reassert itself? The W17 ran promisingly in testing, besides a few reliability hiccups. Reports Mercedes have exploited the engine compression ratio rules more successfully have concerned their rivals and already led to rules changes.
Williams team principal James Vowles, who was at Mercedes during their dominant spell, is among those who believe his former team is back to its best. However there is little sign the scale of their advantage could be anything like it was in 2014, when they were so far ahead they turned their power units down to disguise their advantage. Red Bull and Ferrari have both shown promising signs of pace in testing, giving grounds for confidence the new era of F1 rules will be more competitive from the outset than the last one was.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
Drama at the start?
The FIA trialled changes to F1’s starting procedure in Bahrain due to concerns some cars would get off the line much more slowly than others, potentially leading to dangerous situations. Ferrari appear to have done the best job of tuning their engines to minimise the difficulty of getting the turbo to spin up quickly enough in time for a standing start.
However it remains to be seen whether the changes to F1’s starting procedure will neuter any advantage Ferrari might have had.
How will F1’s new team perform?
“The presence of an 11th team would not, in and of itself, provide value to the championship,” stated Formula One Management two years ago when it closed the door on Andretti’s Cadillac-backed, FIA-endorsed bid to enter F1. Cadillac, as it is now known, eventually overcame FOM’s objections – so what will they bring to the grid this weekend?
The Mario Andretti Cadillac 26 (MAC-26) logged 4,200 kilometres in testing – less than anyone bar Aston Martin – as the team worked through various technical troubles. Neither Sergio Perez nor Valtteri Bottas troubled the top half of the times.
However given the huge challenges a new entrant to F1 faces, Cadillac’s efforts have been entirely respectable so far. Merely not being last at the first race would be an achievement, and Aston Martin’s plight may guarantee them that.
Bottas’s five-place grid penalty, which he has waited over a year to serve, is unlikely to concern them too greatly. If at least one of their cars is running at the flag they will have cause of celebration.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
Early races in jeopardy?
Yesterday FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem acknowledged the crisis in the Middle East following the United States and Israel’s strikes on Iran, and the retaliation that has provoked. The war has spread to other countries including some F1 is due to visit in just a few months’ time, such as Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.
With foreign citizens scrambling to return home from those countries, there will inevitably be pressure to abandon plans to race there sooner rather than later. If those two races cannot go ahead, F1 could find itself without any grands prix in April. Should it start looking for replacements closer to home?
Are you going to the Australian Grand Prix?
If you’re heading to Australia for this weekend’s race, we want to hear from you:
Who do you think will be the team to beat in the Australian Grand Prix? Have your say below.
>> Find out more and sign up
Go ad-free for just £1 per month
Miss nothing from RaceFans
Get a daily email with all our latest stories – and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here: